From 2ec384d211746eb66f25501ad96a970c7ac2988c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Self <j@jxself.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 23:04:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add patent retaliation clause question to FAQ

---
 faq.html | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/faq.html b/faq.html
index e8e970c..a6723f9 100644
--- a/faq.html
+++ b/faq.html
@@ -24,6 +24,14 @@
         preserved, not doing so could make it harder to later track
         down who might have a copyright interest in a given
         work.</p>
+        <p>Q: Does the WPDD have a patent retaliation clause?<br>
+        A: No. In essence these say that, if a licensee sues the 
+        licensor for patent infringement then any patent license that 
+        the licensee received will terminate. The WPDD doesn't 
+        include this for two reasons:</p>
+        <ul><li>You need to have have patents for such a clause to
+        work, and those are given up as part of the WPDD.</li>
+        <li>It runs contrary to the Statement of Purpose.</li></ul>
         <p>Q: Why doesn't the Worldwide Public Domain Dedication
         (WPDD) include trademarks?<br>
         A: The WPDD doesn't include trademarks because that's a
-- 
2.46.0